Meet the Hippomonstrosesquipedallions
Adoxographing as a charientism is hardly seen as a witzelsucht because you can't be blandiloquent while the aelolist is a hippomonstrosespedallion.
(writing skilfully about an unimportant subject can hardly be seen as an attempt at humour when you can't flatter anyone when the person who has a false impression that he has inspiration, is pertaining to awfully long words) Because the philosophunculist who has been a mumpsimus too won't agree to be thelemic about the other people who do things honorificabilitudinitatibus.
(because the person who thinks he knows more than he actually does, and will also keep doing things in his own ways will not let other people do as they like when they do things with honour) The autolatry that they might do just because they know more words is a cacoethes as seen by those who don't like the inaniloquent populace.
(the self-praise that they might do because they know more words is a bad habit as seen by those who don't like the people who say silly things) Honestly, using rare words to define a situation inhebetates the fun of reading.
And I apologize for doing so in the first few lines.
I'm going to make sure I exude any more floccinaucinihilipilificative words below this line, and this line is just another witzelsucht.
Okay now, no one, not even the people at oxford who decide new words to add in the English dictionary like reading absurd sounding words, and normal readers are rather left bewildered at the frequent use of strong and long and unnecessary words.
Personally, it surprises me when I see the new words added to the Standard English dictionary.
Here are a few words which surprised me 1.
Grrrl: n.
A young woman who is regarded as independent, strong and aggressive in her attitude.
2.
threequel: n.
The third book, event or sequel.
3.
lookism: n.
Prejudice on the grounds of one's appearance 4.
frankenfood: n.
a food that contains genetically modified ingredients 5.
meatspace: n.
the physical world, as opposing to the virtual It's not that it surprises me because these words sound stupid, it only seems normal that people want to use the words which make more sense, because they sound like what they actually mean.
Now 'grrrl' becomes another 5 lettered word without a vowel, like the word 'rhythm', which I see as an injustice to the longest word without vowels ever.
Of course, unless you count the plural of rhythm, or another word for twinling which is "TWYNDYLLYNG" thank the Welsh people, for making up this word back in the 15th century.
p.
s.
- don't check, it's not in the dictionary.
(British people don't like Welsh very much) Another important noticeable thing is, the frequent abatement of familiar words in the ordinary articles just make people less interested.
While the established classic writers may have made a few words of their own, like the words 'muggle' and 'hobbit' (now in the dictionary as nouns), did so as to sound simple.
The constant use of such obese words are helpful only if you want to show people how much you know, which is the euphemism for a cacafuego (a boaster).
Leo Tolstoy, in his book 'War and Peace' used 587287 words, and in 'The adventures of Huck Finn' Mark Twain used 109571 words.
These books have been the bestsellers in their category, and no need to ask why, but because every word in these books made sense, and while the writers did not have to boast about their immaculate knowledge of the English language.
They knew the words and where to use it.
My point is; the absurd use of uncommon words is for a lack of a better word, a rectalgia (pain-in-the-ass).
Even though the 'common' changes very commonly, you can't deny that you just don't like reading a few books because you know you'd end up reading the dictionary more than you read the book.
Simplicity is a grace, to all those who use it.
Saying what you want to say, will sound more interesting if the other person knows what you're talking about.
Sometimes, it feels like a boring English lecture where the teacher puts more thoughts into the literature than there actually is.
The power of simplicity can't be understood until you've felt the joy of it.
It's like one of those statements where you say exactly what you want, nothing more, and nothing less.
Knowing more words might be helpful in a quiz between two people who are dangerously obsessed with their vocabulary count and have ridiculous insecurity levels.
A language should be treated as a language, while here, in our country India, it does not stay hidden for long when someone uses a completely disastrous word and ruins the occasion just because that person wanted to use that one weird word which made no sense at all with the context.
Girl: "hi, do you want to come in for a cup of coffee?" Boy: "no, I'd rather stay out here.
" Girl: "why?" Boy: "because, I'm in claustrophobia" (laughs weirdly for his failed attempt to sound smart) A funny quote by Doug Larson:
Well of course, not everyone does, but I want to show you why you shouldn't take pride just because you can speak a language more fluently because at the end of the day, it's just a language.
Moreover, the implications of using complicated sentences and words will make you forget what you were trying to say in the first place (for example see the first few lines, in the same article, if that wasn't obvious).
(writing skilfully about an unimportant subject can hardly be seen as an attempt at humour when you can't flatter anyone when the person who has a false impression that he has inspiration, is pertaining to awfully long words) Because the philosophunculist who has been a mumpsimus too won't agree to be thelemic about the other people who do things honorificabilitudinitatibus.
(because the person who thinks he knows more than he actually does, and will also keep doing things in his own ways will not let other people do as they like when they do things with honour) The autolatry that they might do just because they know more words is a cacoethes as seen by those who don't like the inaniloquent populace.
(the self-praise that they might do because they know more words is a bad habit as seen by those who don't like the people who say silly things) Honestly, using rare words to define a situation inhebetates the fun of reading.
And I apologize for doing so in the first few lines.
I'm going to make sure I exude any more floccinaucinihilipilificative words below this line, and this line is just another witzelsucht.
Okay now, no one, not even the people at oxford who decide new words to add in the English dictionary like reading absurd sounding words, and normal readers are rather left bewildered at the frequent use of strong and long and unnecessary words.
Personally, it surprises me when I see the new words added to the Standard English dictionary.
Here are a few words which surprised me 1.
Grrrl: n.
A young woman who is regarded as independent, strong and aggressive in her attitude.
2.
threequel: n.
The third book, event or sequel.
3.
lookism: n.
Prejudice on the grounds of one's appearance 4.
frankenfood: n.
a food that contains genetically modified ingredients 5.
meatspace: n.
the physical world, as opposing to the virtual It's not that it surprises me because these words sound stupid, it only seems normal that people want to use the words which make more sense, because they sound like what they actually mean.
Now 'grrrl' becomes another 5 lettered word without a vowel, like the word 'rhythm', which I see as an injustice to the longest word without vowels ever.
Of course, unless you count the plural of rhythm, or another word for twinling which is "TWYNDYLLYNG" thank the Welsh people, for making up this word back in the 15th century.
p.
s.
- don't check, it's not in the dictionary.
(British people don't like Welsh very much) Another important noticeable thing is, the frequent abatement of familiar words in the ordinary articles just make people less interested.
While the established classic writers may have made a few words of their own, like the words 'muggle' and 'hobbit' (now in the dictionary as nouns), did so as to sound simple.
The constant use of such obese words are helpful only if you want to show people how much you know, which is the euphemism for a cacafuego (a boaster).
Leo Tolstoy, in his book 'War and Peace' used 587287 words, and in 'The adventures of Huck Finn' Mark Twain used 109571 words.
These books have been the bestsellers in their category, and no need to ask why, but because every word in these books made sense, and while the writers did not have to boast about their immaculate knowledge of the English language.
They knew the words and where to use it.
My point is; the absurd use of uncommon words is for a lack of a better word, a rectalgia (pain-in-the-ass).
Even though the 'common' changes very commonly, you can't deny that you just don't like reading a few books because you know you'd end up reading the dictionary more than you read the book.
Simplicity is a grace, to all those who use it.
Saying what you want to say, will sound more interesting if the other person knows what you're talking about.
Sometimes, it feels like a boring English lecture where the teacher puts more thoughts into the literature than there actually is.
The power of simplicity can't be understood until you've felt the joy of it.
It's like one of those statements where you say exactly what you want, nothing more, and nothing less.
Knowing more words might be helpful in a quiz between two people who are dangerously obsessed with their vocabulary count and have ridiculous insecurity levels.
A language should be treated as a language, while here, in our country India, it does not stay hidden for long when someone uses a completely disastrous word and ruins the occasion just because that person wanted to use that one weird word which made no sense at all with the context.
Girl: "hi, do you want to come in for a cup of coffee?" Boy: "no, I'd rather stay out here.
" Girl: "why?" Boy: "because, I'm in claustrophobia" (laughs weirdly for his failed attempt to sound smart) A funny quote by Doug Larson:
"if the English language made any sense then a catastrophe would be an atastrophe, with fur"If you don't believe me, believe the people who make fun of their first language.
Well of course, not everyone does, but I want to show you why you shouldn't take pride just because you can speak a language more fluently because at the end of the day, it's just a language.
Moreover, the implications of using complicated sentences and words will make you forget what you were trying to say in the first place (for example see the first few lines, in the same article, if that wasn't obvious).
"simplicity is the ultimate sophistication" - Leanardo da Vinci "everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler" - Albert EinstienSo, if you have perused through this article well enough to get my point, here's one last quote for you from the novel 'War and Peace' by Leo Tolstoy which read:
"Freethinkers are those who are willing to use their minds without prejudice and without fearing to understand things that clash with their own customs, privileges, or beliefs.
This state of mind is not common, but it is essential for right thinking...
"
